Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Extras | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

All we need is love

March 6, 2013

What’s love got to do with this? Cliches, such as “love makes the world go ’round,” “all’s fair in love and war,” “opposites attract,” “fall head over heels,” etc....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(16)

Steiner

Mar-06-13 8:34 AM

Goodness gracious, this sounds just like the hippies in the 60's ! Love, try sendng love to Washington instead of taxes, see how far that goes. The hippies of the 60's missed the electronic revolution and even a chemical revolution that came later due to the love thing. Some inventors had broken marriages or never married as women did not like what their hubbys were doing. Love again. At the basic unit of life, there is no love. Any Magi would know this. That is how they knew the christ child and the apostles were clueless. You would have to know the magis story to understand this libs. Hint, when Christ called Peter a rock, it was tantamount to calling him a blockhead. The author shows why women lag in science and business, the love thing clouds their thinking.

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

judeye

Mar-06-13 8:44 AM

All you need is LOVE. Thank you for an inspiring letter.

Oh yes, if only we all would give a little more, share a bit more, and love lots more, oh what a wonderful world we would have.

Thanks for the reminder. Will try to love a bit more today...might even do a few random acts of kindness.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Steiner

Mar-06-13 9:10 AM

Judyee, you cant be serious ! how much money does our govt take and you want us to give more in any way ? You are saying what the hippies said. You do not understand history at all. All the cliches you use, random acts of kindness, love a little more. Judeye, i say again. the males who invented everything did not use this love thing. and, for the Delta Phi epsilon sorority, they had wrinkles and were not photographed scantily clad either .

0 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-06-13 11:38 AM

Note to self: Remember to send all those Steiner posts to Scott Adams (creator of the Dilbert comic strip).

:-)

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SmallTownSmallMind

Mar-06-13 12:11 PM

Steinerrhoid: You are the ultimate rock. Jesus was not a scientist and thus held the ideal of love, i.e. loving one another, taking care of your brethren as the ticket to true happiness. In my opinion, you suffer from love deprivation and it is irreversible as you display characteristics of one who is impossible to be loved. Thus, I suggest that love's manifested counterpart, SEX, be incorporated into your life as soon as possible. This could allow for the good heart that is deep within you, I believe, to appear and take part in this world as an intelligent, caring, empathic human being. Please note, Stein-man, the sex cannot be with yourself, even if you are a successful narcissistic chemist. It must be shared, and, oh, it can be with a male or female, but he/she must be of the human species, no goats, sheep, or other forms of *********** allowed. Happiness awaits you, don't be afraid of change. Just think of all the libs to which you will endear yourself.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-06-13 2:15 PM

“...when Christ called Peter a rock, it was tantamount to calling him a blockhead.”

Although even Christians, e.g., Catholics and Protestants, disagree as to the translation/meaning of Matthew 16:18, the fact Jesus probably spoke Aramaic means there was no distinction/delineator for pe****ta (rock) as there is in Greek for petros and petra.

The natural reading of the passage, despite the necessary shift from petros to petra required by the word play in the Greek (but not in Aramaic, where the same word kepha occurs in both places).

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-06-13 2:19 PM

“Any Magi would know this. That is how they knew the christ child and the apostles were clueless.”

Clueless? Is that why a caravan of Magi journeyed hundreds of miles from Persia to Jerusalem and then Nazareth to honor the new-born Savior? And brought with them the “currency of the day” – fit for a king – to honor Jesus?

Surely these learned Magi – you know, all male scientists(!) – couldn’t all have been snookered by God, Daniel, 600 years of prophesies, and their own beliefs!

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Steiner

Mar-07-13 8:17 AM

The learned posters goof it again. The bible , as all ancient writings are , is written in a double dialectic. Peter was a small blockhead for sure libs. jesus not a scientist, wrong again libs. he turned the water into wine and fed the fed multitudes. The Zoroasterians would have known immedietely what he did.They did some of this themselves. Water was sacred to them.Who was asking for intrepretations, the apostles. Male scientists DK, you got that right. How come the apostles were not snookered as the magi were ?DK goofs it again. The women , for some zoroasterians were looked as vessels of pleasure. It appears that Islam picked up on this for sure .My steinertrons are based exactly on the snookering of the Magi coupled with modern, narcistic science.Dk, you do not know what you are talking about !

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Steiner

Mar-07-13 8:28 AM

Hey DK, my steinertrons use the water principle , known to the Magi, snookered as you would say. hey, how come the women never get snookered this way.feminine intuition I guess. Coupled with the fact that Ahura Mazda told Zoroaster that the atmosphere dampens a great many things down to imperceptible levels. Narcissism here, snookering again for DK. So learned posters, you make fools out of yourselves. What was the end told of by jesus, ? The end of the blockhead approach,materialism, typified by peter, and a return to a more zoroasterian ideal, modified with science of modern times. It is science that uses the strong forces made to appear in machines. I say again, at the basic level of life, there is no love. You posters are clueless here as to this. , time to mock then.Snooker me DK !

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Steiner

Mar-07-13 8:39 AM

More for the posters to mock. The magi would have known that life and death , birth and death was under great influence of a strong force being known as Ahriman or Satan.He shows no love. There are strong force beings as matter would frit away without them . The strong force is much greater than the nuclear force we have unleasehd today.Pound for pound, at least 100 to 1000 times greater. All of ancient writings, religions was based on the fact of contact with strong force beings. It is a good thing some of it was written dowwn, cuz if you know science or worked in industry, you could guess via the Niels bohr approach as to what the ancients were up to. The apostles were not in this class. Dk, is this snookering again ? And how is it none of you posters have been snookered into figuring what these ancient people did ? They raised up civilizations and had huge influences on life,then and now, my steinertrons. And Dk calls that snookering. Way to go DK .

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-07-13 8:54 AM

“I can win an argument on any topic, against any opponent. People know this, and steer clear of me at parties. Often, as a sign of their great respect, they don't even invite me.” ~ Dave Barry

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-07-13 1:54 PM

"My steinertrons are based exactly on the snookering of the Magi coupled with modern, narcistic science."

Um...and THAT sentence mad sense?

:-)

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Steiner

Mar-08-13 8:18 AM

dk goofs it again. Had dk read all the posts, i have been called a narcisstic person.See smalltownsmallmind. It is hard for libs to understand this. My steinertrons, the machines that manipulate the strong force were based on what the ancients like Zoroaster were doing and my knowledge of science. try and get some facts and knowledge of science dk, read some books or talk to a teacher. Anyone with an open mind and a knowledge of science could do what I did. If you steadfastly believe in darwin, however, you will fail. Darwin theory does not support this. Some of the work is taken right from the particle accelerators or cyclotrons, DK. Hardly nonsense. So please dk, you do not know what you are talking about. Come up with more useless quotes, that is all you have. I have machines based on solid physics. You have words. Dk, you certainly do not know what bible scholars say how it is written.You resort to mocking as all libs do.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-08-13 12:55 PM

Ah, geeez, this is like arguing with a six-year-old already with dementia...

...and I'm reminded of Einstein's well-known quote: "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-08-13 2:28 PM

"steinertrons?"

Please send a note to Sergey Brin or Larry Page (founders of Google) to include "steintron" in Google's search results.

:-)

P.S. I did study "a little" science for my MS in Telecommunications and my MS in Management of IT. And at my company I teach new-hire engineers "a little" about things like IPv6 routing, VoIP origination/termination, Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS), Shortest Path Bridging (SPB) and virtual rate centers.

You know, science...

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DKexpat

Mar-08-13 5:25 PM

Holy smokes, Mr. Science! I DID find a "steinertron" . . . at the dollar store.

I reverse-engineered it . . . the pieces spelled out c-r-a-z-y.

:-)

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 16 of 16 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web