Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | PDF Edition | Extras | Home RSS
 
 
 

Unions protect salaries, not jobs

July 25, 2010
The OBSERVER

With the dirty work out of the way, members of some area teacher unions wasted no time in approving new contracts - with generous pay raises - from their school boards. Two of the most recently approved contracts - in Westfield and Dunkirk - came after both districts shed a number of positions, due to reduced aid funding from New York state all while attempting to keep higher taxes at a minimum.

In Westfield, three positions and numerous coaching posts were eliminated in June, which led to this comment from Karen Belcher, teachers' union president: "It's terrible. The teachers are upset about losing some of their colleagues. The union is not happy we're losing these positions."

But one month later, the union was much better mood - and quite obviously past the loss of their laid-off colleagues - learning of the new three-year contract with salary increases totaling 14.5 percent. "I'm happy," Belcher said. "It will be nice to go back to a new school year and not have to worry about it. It should be a great thing for both sides."

But not so great for those job casualties.

In Dunkirk, the contractual pay increases total 7.5 percent over two years while a retirement incentive has been offered and at least 25 positions have been reduced.

Both these contracts - approved as the nation comes out of a recession and the state continues in a major fiscal crisis - prove once again that in public-sector unions, it's never one for all and all for one. It's really all about keeping the ones at the top "happy" even if "it's terrible" those at the bottom - or the most recent hires - are losing their jobs.

 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web