Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Extras | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS

Silver Creek: Have foreman stick to job

March 22, 2013

Silver Creek Department of Public Works foreman Ralph Crawford was upset over a commentary that was published earlier this month in this newspaper that was critical of his departmen....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Mar-28-13 3:02 PM


0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-24-13 12:37 PM

It would be a MIRACLE IF the village sees a penny from FEMA. Ball dropped at the beginning and no one has bothered to pick it up. The entire board (including the Mayor and "Forman")should be held accountable with the exception of Amy Romanik who was against the purchase of the Bentages building from the start. The entire thing is a disgrace.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-24-13 10:03 AM

Anna Fredricksons mouth piece speaks again.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-23-13 11:20 PM

The only comment that is correct is #3 and it hit the nail on the head! And how convenient it is right across from his residence.

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-22-13 10:42 AM

To the clueless church lady gaggle OBSERVER board geese:

Get over it.

Considering how you are fully funded, and fully op-ed, by a West Virginia Sugar Daddy, your opinion and your analyses into the management/spending affairs of local village operations is wholly inappropriate, totally out-of-your-league let alone nosy-busy-body unwanted.

Besides, I just heard the Sugar Daddy whistle out the back door, so why don't you go be the good lap dogs you are and run back to West Virginia?

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-22-13 9:36 AM

This commentary is utter nonsense.If the observer had gathered the facts instead of listening to the baseless comments uttered at a board meeting maybe their comments would make sense.The observer fails to state that the resolution to purchase the Bentges property was approved by the board not Crawford.Maybe the observer might want to look into the only person in the village with a personal agenda is the chief of police.He still has Anna Fredrickson doing his bidding at every board meeting.By the way wasn't Fredrickson one of the board members who approved the Bentges sight?

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Mar-22-13 8:21 AM

Why should Crawford care, Crawford does NOT pay one nickel in Village Tax. Fact, he is the only employee of the streets department that does not reside in the Village.

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 7 of 7 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web