Oral arguments in local efforts to overturn the state’s Freshwater Wetlands Act changes will be heard Friday, Jan. 23, in the state Supreme Court in Albany.

Justice Richard Platkin announced the case scheduling in an order issued Dec. 19. If any of the parties want to postpone oral arguments they need to confer with other attorneys involved and propose at least two mutually agreeable dates and times, at least one of which is a Friday morning.

Four cases — all filed within a few weeks of each other in the spring — are being heard at the same time. The first to file was the Chautauqua Lake Property Owners Association, followed in short order by the Chautauqua Lake Partnership, Village of Kiryas Joel and the Business Council of New York state. Each of the legal challenges also has co-signers involved as well, while state lawmakers including Assemblyman Andrew Molitor, state Sen. George Borrello, former Assemblyman Andrew Goodell and environmental groups have filed amicus curie briefs that raise issues not included in the original lawsuits or briefs filed by the state Attorney General’s office.

The Chautauqua Lake Property Owners Association, town of Ellery, Bemus Point Business Association and Builders Association of the Southern Tier are asking the state Supreme Court to annul, vacate and set aside the 2022 amendments to the state’s Freshwater Wetlands Act that took effect Jan. 1, 2025. The local organizations are represented by William A. Hurst of Young Sommer in Troy. The lawsuit argues the Freshwater Wetlands Act changes violate the State Administrative Procedure Act, violate state and federal due process protections in the state and U.S. constitutions, that the amendments are arbitrary, capricious and irrational; that the DEC’s newly created jurisdictional determination process constitutes an improper delegation of authority; and that the Freshwater Wetlands Act changes violate the state’s Municipal Home Rule Law by taking authority designated to local governments.

Among the arguments Hurst makes in Memorandum of Law filed with the state Supreme Court in Albany County is that the new permitting standards included in the Freshwater Wetlands Act, which require landowners to demonstrate that proposed activities are the only practicable alternative and that landowners have to provide a compelling justification impose an undue burden on property rights. Hurst wrote that the new DEC’s standards effectively subject routine land use decisions to an insurmountable threshold without clear statutory support. In the end, he argues, the structure decided upon after the passage of the Freshwater Wetlands Act infringes too much upon landowners’ rights without due process or just compensation.

Hurst also takes issue with the Freshwater Wetlands Act’s delegation of regulatory authority to nongovernmental actors, as permitted under the newly adopted wetlands framework while the state Legislature’s decision as part of the 2022-23 adopted budget to eliminate local governments’ ability to designate freshwater wetlands of “Unusual Local Importance” constitutes an unconstitutional intrusion on local self-governance that Hurst says violates the state constitution and the state’s Municipal Home Rule Law.